Compare

LISTNBASE vs the alternatives

Last verified 16 July 2026. Everything below is drawn from each company's own published material. If we've got something wrong or out of date, tell us at our contact page and we'll correct it.

Start with who owns your data

In the last six months the independent sector's infrastructure was bought, almost entirely, by the majors:

PlatformWhat it isWho owns it now
LISTNBASELabel operating systemIndependent — (Music Label Group)
ReprtoirCatalog + royalty accountingIndependent
CurveRoyalty accountingIndependent — divested from Universal by EC order, Feb 2026
RevelatorDistribution + rightsWarner Music (April 2026)
FUGAWhite-label distributionUniversal (Virgin Music Group)
SongtrustPublishing adminUniversal (via Downtown, Feb 2026)
CD BabyDIY distributionUniversal (via Downtown, Feb 2026)




The Curve line is the one worth reading twice. When Universal bought Downtown, the European Commission approved it on the condition that Universal divest Curve — because Curve held the royalty and contractual data of independent labels competing with Universal.

A regulator looked at a major label owning the system that holds your royalty data and said no. That is the argument for independence, and we didn't have to make it.

What each one actually does

CapabilityLISTNBASEReprtoirCurveRevelator
Catalog & metadataYesYesYesYes
Royalty accountingYesYesYesYes
Artist / rights-holder portalYesYesYesYes
Contracts & documentsYes — with e-signatureContract managementNot offeredNot offered
A&R / demo inboxYesNot offeredNot offeredNot offered
Marketing campaigns & PRYesNot offeredNot offeredNot offered
Electronic press kitsYesNot offeredNot offeredNot offered
BookingsYesNot offeredNot offeredNot offered
Touring & tour P&LYesNot offeredNot offeredNot offered
Recording budgetsYesNot offeredNot offeredNot offered
Neighbouring rightsDedicated moduleIngests NR statementsNot offeredNot offered
Fan links & captureYesNot offeredNot offeredNot offered
Distribution to storesThrough MLG DistributionNot offeredNot offered800+ DSPs
White-label & your own domainFor Top-Tier LabelsNot offeredNot offeredPaid add-on
Independent of a major labelYesYesYesNo — Warner
"Not offered" means the capability does not appear in that company's published feature list as at 16 July 2026. Software changes; if this is out of date, tell us and we'll fix it.

Who this is for

Listn Base is built for independent labels, artist management companies, and label services teams running 5 to 50 artists—the ones currently doing this across spreadsheets, Drive, and email.

If you're a distributor ingesting from seventy sources or a publisher who needs cross-collateralization across contract groups and 150+ currencies, you need enterprise royalty software, and we'll say so on a call. If you'd rather hand accounting to an outsourced team entirely, that's a managed service, not software.

Everyone in between is who we built this for.

The actual question

Nobody on this page is trying to be what we're trying to be. Reprtoir does catalog and royalties, brilliantly, and says so. Curve does royalty accounting, brilliantly, and says so. The market's own advice is to assemble a stack: one tool for royalties, another for links, another for marketing, another for your press kits, and a spreadsheet for touring.

That works. It also means five logins, five invoices, five vendors who each hold a piece of your label, and no single place where an artist can see what they're owed.


LISTNBASE is the argument against the stack. One login, from your landing in your inbox to a payout landing in your artist's. Your roster, your contracts, your releases, your campaigns, your tour P&L and your royalties, on your own domain, owned by nobody but you.

If you need the deepest royalty engine on the market, buy the deepest royalty engine on the market. If you want to run a label, talk to us.

Run the whole label in one place

Every module, your own domain, no major label holding your data.

See pricing